Sunday, March 15, 2009

Archaeology of Jerusalem...

March 15, 2009

Today we had yet another field study, this one for Archaeology. We were going to look at the Southern Wall excavations, but due to the rain, we headed instead to the Wohl Museum. This is another place that I had been to on my first visit to the city and hadn't yet re-visited. I don't remember much about my first visit, but I have no doubt that we were given more information this time around. :)

From the late 40's to the early 60's the Jewish quarter in the old city was under the control of the Jordanian government and by the time it was re-take by the state of Israel in the 60's, much of it had been destroyed. Some of the buildings were at least partially salvageable, but many were only rubble. These later buildings were cleared away in preparation for re-building. However, before construction commenced, the Israelis realized that this was a rare opportunity to "look under the skirt of the city" (as my professor put it) and so they commenced to excavate on these newly cleared areas. Nahman Avigad was in charge of the excavations. About 30 different areas in the Jewish Quarter of the old city were excavated. They found a variety of different finds from different periods, some dating all the way back to the Iron Age (or First Temple Period). After the excavations were finished, buildings were, of course, placed over all of these sites. However, in many cases the buildings were built so that the discoveries under them would still be accessible. In the case of the Wohl Museum, one specific time period is conserved for display - the second temple period. (Everything else was either removed or coverd up so as not to confuse visitors.)

What Avigad found in this area, and what we subsequently explored today, is a few very large mansions: rich, luxurious, and apparently belonging to Jews, as evidenced by the numerous mikvaot (ritual baths). We saw quite a few mosaics, pillars, frescoes, various household implements, and coins. All of these things were likely destroyed/buried in 70AD when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem. They give us quite a lot of insight into the time in which the New Testament was written. I won't bore you with the details of what kinds of pottery was used for what, but rest assured that we were given very detailed explanations of things that you never even knew existed. :)

We then ventured out in the rain again (not hard rain, just enough to make my notes completely illegible). We looked a little at excavations near the temple mount, and then at excavations along the modern day southern wall. It's an incredibly complex city. Everywhere you look there are archaeological remains, and most likely the remains are a mixture of 3 different times (and probably 3 different religions). Even on our own campus we have remains of a tower and a wall that were part of the "First wall" from Hasmonean times. One could study this city for a life time and not even begin to know all of her secrets.

It was a wet and cold morning, and I was glad to get home, but it was good to learn and soak up a little of Gabi's knowledge of the city.

5 comments:

Dr Chris Hill said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dr Chris Hill said...

Dear Alana,

I have a question relevant to the visits you write about in this posting and its relevance to your current studies in Israel.

I'm still very uncertain that I completely understand your ideas on salvation. You say that the only way into heaven is through Jesus, but has that always been the case? You visited all these old buildings that were built and occupied by Jews for many years before Jesus was born. Now given that Christianity is based on the Jewish God, does that mean that the Jews who followed their religion before Christ came did get to enter into heaven when they died, or did the coming of Jesus alter the rules? If the answer is that they didn't get into heaven then does Judaism really count as a legitimate religion, because surely the whole point of a religion is to offer salvation and without that it must be nothing more than a meaningless belief. Then if it is just a meaningless belief why are you wasting your time studying it? This last reasoning must apply to any Jewish history after AD 32 anyway, regardless of the answer to my previous question.

Even more relevant: this Jewish belief must in fact have drawn people away from Christ so therefore it is (I assume) a tool of Satan. Do you have a reasoned argument against my logic?

From,
Chris Hill

(Lancaster)

PS.
As always I mean to engage in a debate to lead us both to a better understanding of our beliefs and views, not to antagonise anyone. The truth must be able to stand up to this sort of critical examination surely?

Dr Chris Hill said...

Hi Alana,

I know I jumped the gun a couple of weeks back by suggesting you had decided to ignore my questions, and I certainly don't want to appear to be doing that again, but have you had time to look over the points I made in my last comment yet?

I really am interested in hearing your thoughts on the points I made, both in the comment on this posting (above) and the one on the March 10th posting, entitled Happy Purim.

Please don't think I'm being rude in asking for your reply, it's just I'm wondering if you can fault my logic.

Keep well.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

Alana said...

Chris,
Again, I am not ignoring your questions. I do, however, have a full load at school and many other thoughts and activities to keep me occupied. The purpose of this blog is for me to write down my thoughts and experiences to keep my friends and family sort of up to date since I’m so far away from most of them. I have an interest in apologetics which is why I do try to reply to your posts occasionally, but you seem to have a tendency to try to dominate to comment section and I would like to keep it more open at times for friends and family who might not feel comfortable commenting after you.

To attempt to answer your questions about beliefs and how Judaism relates…

First of all, the Bible (not I) says that the only way to Heaven is through Jesus. This is an important distinction because I don’t want to claim to be authoritative. I believe that the Bible is, though.

It is true that Christianity has its roots in Judaism. However, I must tell you plainly that the Judaism of today is almost totally different from what was practiced during the Old Testament and even New Testament times. Do I think modern Judaism is a valid way to God? No. I think that it was also founded on the truth of Torah (the Old Testament) but that it has taken that truth and twisted it and added to it so that it is no longer really true.

In Old Testament Judaism, however, the way to God is the same as the way to God in the New Testament: through faith. The only difference is that in the New Testament our faith is centered on God in human form and his work on the cross. But we are told that “Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him as righteousness” – in other words, Abraham, the founder of Judaism, was saved by faith in God as well. Ultimately, Christ’s work on the cross saves both Old Testament and New Testament saints, though perhaps the Old Testament saints didn’t understand as fully.

Hope that helps.
Alana

Dr Chris Hill said...

Hi Alana,

I do realise that you are far from home and that these blog posting are a way of keeping your family and friends in touch with your everyday life in Israel. In no way would I like to interfere with that contact, so if any of your family or friend felt uneasy about my comments, please pass on my apologises to them, it really was unintentional.

Your answer really wasn't very informative, at least in the area of your ability to socialise with people who you believe are denying children a place in heaven by teaching (one might even say indoctrinating) them into the false belief system of Judaism. Your presence in the synagogue must have help, at least in a small way, to reinforce the children's beliefs i.e. 'we Jews can't really be denied entry into heaven, or this nice Christian lady wouldn't be happily playing with us and enjoying the service'. Nor have you identified your church, so your blog followers can research its beliefs. OK I accept that may be because you have reservations about my comments appearing on your church's web site in the states. But I have already said that that is not my intention, and it would give me an idea of the beliefs your church stands for.

Anyway Alana let me apologise once again for jumping the gun by asking for an answer to my questions, and I do thank you for making your ideas on pre Christ Jewish beliefs a little clearer. But, as I Said above, I'm afraid you have still failed to address the contradictions between your beliefs and your actions.

Keep well.
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

PS.
Nothing I say is meant to be antagonistic or rude, I simply wish to understand a cross section of religious beliefs more fully. Because at the moment to me they all seem to be nonsensical, and given they still remain so widespread I feel I must be missing the point somewhere along the line.